This is just one of the 122 prison establishment entries that we have on The Prison Oracle.
Each one is updated immediately new information such as an Inspection or IMB Report is available, and you can access all the others establishment entries, along with 44,000 pages of other prison-related information, for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week – Learn More
Latest News
This section is designed to give you a quick overview of the events, reports, concerns and news items concerning this establishment – only The Prison Oracle gives you this; simple just as it should be!
2026
17th June : Latest IMB report published – Learn More
2025
29th October : How to book official visits section revised – Learn More >>
8th September : HMIP inspection report published – Learn More
2026
Description of the establishment
Category B or lower/ Young Offenders suitable for closed conditions or lower (not Restricted Status)
HMP Lewes is a reception and resettlement category B local prison for male adult and young adult prisoners (aged 18 to 21). It mostly serves the courts of East and West Sussex and holds sentenced and unsentenced prisoners and prisoners on remand (being held until their trial or subsequent sentence hearing) in categories B and C. It also takes some category D prisoners returned from open conditions and holds foreign national prisoners whose prison sentences have been completed but who are then detained under Home Office powers prior to deportation.
The prison’s operational capacity (maximum accommodated without risk of disruption due to overcrowding) at the end of January 2026 was 624. At that time, the prison held 603 prisoners.
The prison is located in Lewes, the county town of East Sussex. It has seven residential wings, plus an inpatient healthcare unit and a care and separation unit used to segregate prisoners. The main buildings, with five residential wings, have been in use since 1853. A modern block, with two residential wings, opened in 2008. Details of the accommodation are as follows:
- A wing: a general wing for drug recovery, housing up to 125 prisoners.
- B wing: the care and separation unit (CSU) for segregating prisoners, with 16 cells, including two where a prisoner can be kept under constant supervision by a member of staff to reduce the risk of suicide or self-harm, and two special accommodation cells where items such as furniture, bedding and sanitation are removed in the interests of prisoner safety.
- C wing: a general wing, housing up to 150 prisoners.
- F wing: for vulnerable prisoners, housing up to 147 prisoners; also used occasionally to house low numbers of newly arrived prisoners when the early days centre (L wing) is full.
- G wing, also known as Minerva wing, an incentivised drug free living unit housing up to 23 prisoners.
- K wing: a designated neurodiverse wing housing up to 22 prisoners.
- L wing: the early days centre (EDC) for newly arrived prisoners, with single cells housing up to 80 prisoners.
- M wing: a general wing of single cells housing up to 94 prisoners.
- Healthcare centre (HCC), an acute inpatient care unit for up to nine prisoners.
There is a large, well-equipped gym and a second sports hall for prisoner use, an outdoor sports pitch, a multi-faith centre, two education areas, a library, various workshops and a visits hall.
The main providers of services to the prison were: Serco (transport to courts and local prisons); Gov Facility Services Ltd/GFSL (facilities’ management in prisons across southern England); DHL (ordering and delivering prisoners’ purchases); Bidfood (kitchen supplies); East Sussex County Council (library services and social care); Milton Keynes College (education); HM Prison and Probation Service;
Visiting information – 2026
Book and plan your visit to Lewes
To visit someone in Lewes you must:
- be on that person’s visitor list
- book your visit at least 24 hours in advance
- have the required ID with you when you go
At least one visitor must be 18 or older at every visit.
There may be a limit to the number of visits a prisoner can have. You can check this with Lewes.
Contact Lewes if you have more questions about visiting.
Help with the cost of your visit
If you get certain benefits or have an NHS health certificate, you might be able to get help with the costs of your visit, including:
- travel to Lewes
- somewhere to stay overnight
- meals
How to book family and friends visits
You can book your visit online.
You must arrive at least 45 minutes before your visit to allow for security and processing.
HMP Lewes is able to offer social and professional visits for those with mobility concerns, please email SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk, if you require support with your visit due to mobility concerns. If you require to change any information on your online booking please contact SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk with your requests.
Visiting times
- Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday: 2pm to 3:30pm
How to book official visits
You can also book official video visits only by:
- emailing, Lewes.Videolinks@Justice.gov.uk
- calling, 01273 785 019 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 4:30pm)
You can book official visits by:
- emailing, legalvisits.lewes@justice.gov.uk
- calling, 01273 785 135 (Monday to Friday, 8am to midday and 1pm to 4:30pm)
- Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 4:30pm
- Saturday, 9am to 11:30am and 2pm to 4pm
- Sunday, 9am to 11:30am and 2pm to 4pm
Official face to face visiting times:
- Monday, 2pm to 4pm
- Tuesday, 2pm to 4pm
- Wednesday, 9am to 11:30am
- Thursday, 2pm to 4pm
- Friday, 9am to 11:30am
- Saturday, 2pm to 4pm
- Sunday, 9am to 11:30am and 2pm to 4pm
How to book Early days visits
Anybody who is newly convicted (not on recall or remand) can have an ‘early day’ visit subject to availability. When available, this will take place within 72 hours and will be available for up to 3 visitors only above the age of 18.
Visitors can request to book these by emailing SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk.
There is also limited availability to use Prison video app for those that can not visit in person.
Visiting times:
- Wednesday, Friday and Sunday: 9am to 11:30am
Entering Lewes
All visitors, aged 16 or older must prove their identity before entering the prison. Read the list of acceptable forms of ID when visiting a prison.
- All visitors go through our EGS (Enhanced Gate Security) this process is similar to airport security. (bag x-ray and metal portals) all visitors can be subject to a pat-down search, including children.
- You may also be sniffed by security dogs.
- Visitors must adhere to the prison dress code that applies when entering Lewes, please see dress code below.
- There are strict controls on what you can take into Lewes. You will have to leave all the things you have with you in a locker, apart from items required for infants and medication is subject the individual concerned and to our security processes.
- Lewes is cash only. Each adult visitor can take in up to £25 in £10 notes, £5 notes and coins to spend on hot and cold refreshments. (£20 notes are not allowed.) The vending machine takes coins, so please bring coins if you can, as we may not be able to help with giving change.
- When visiting your partner, family member or friend, there is an expectation that you will remain polite and respectful to all other visitors and all staff. HMP Lewes has the right to deny entry or terminate a visit if a visitor is offensive or aggressive towards any other visitor, prisoner, or member of staff.
Dress code
The following items of clothing will not be allowed to enter HMP Lewes:
- Steel toe-capped boots or shoes with exposed metal parts, Cycle or Motorcycle shoes or boots
- Gloves, Hats, scarves or any headgear that is not worn on religious grounds. (Baby’s bonnets are acceptable but must be removed by parent for searching)
- Sunglasses (unless prescription glasses)
- Smart watches of any kind, including fitness trackers
- Any item of clothing that has offensive, racial or sexist logos, words or pictures
- No clothing made by Hoodrich, Criminal Damage, AYEgear
- Excessively revealing, i.e. very short skirts/dresses including shorts, see through tops, crop tops and strapless tops, unitard jumpsuit/ tight jumpsuit
- Visible or exposed underwear of any kind (With exception of brassier straps in the shoulder area)
- Ripped clothing for the torso
- Ripped jeans above the knee will not be allowed
- Excessively large metal hair accessories
- Helmets of any kind (Except medical issue)
Clothing cannot be removed during the visits session and visitors are to make sure they are comfortably dressed before they enter the visitor searching area.
This list is not exhaustive. All enquiries should be directed in the first instance to the staff in the Visits booking or Visits Senior officer.
Visiting facilities
PACT runs the visitors centre with toys and art materials and a small play area for children. Refreshments will be available to purchase during your visit.
If you have a disability, let the prison know and they will make sure your visit is on the lower level.
Family visits
HMP Lewes have introduced a new approach to Family Visits which were previously known as Family Days.
Each day will be split into two sessions, one held in the morning, and one held in the afternoon. Although the Family Visits will be shorter (3 hours per session) having two sessions will support more prisoners having the opportunity to apply for these events and spending time with loved ones.
- All visitors must be on the prisoners approved visitors list
- Children are considered an adult from their 18th birthday
- Applications are submitted by the prisoners and considered by the Family Visits Committee
- Applications are considered individually, taking into account a number of points including, the available space within the Visits Hall
- HMP Lewes is governed by the Health and Safety regulations in relations to the overall number of people permitted in the Visits Hall at any one time
- This overall figure will also include Staff and PACT
- Session times will be from 9am to 12pm and 2pm to 5pm
- The new model permits up to 20 prisoners and their families to take part in the event on each session
- Activities for children will be available
- Light refreshments will also be provided by PACT, and the Snack Shop will also be open as usual where your families can purchase light refreshments
Keep in touch with someone at Lewes
There are several ways you can keep in touch with someone during their time at Lewes.
Secure video calls
To have a secure video call with someone in this prison you need to:
- Download the Prison Video app
- Create an account
- Register all visitors
- Add the prisoner to your contact list.
How to book a secure video call
You can request a secure video call with someone in this prison via the Prison Video app.
You will receive a notification when your request has been accepted.
Phone calls
Prisoners have phones in their cells but they will always have to call you. They buy phone credits to do this and can call anytime between 6am and midnight.
They can phone anyone named on their list of friends and family. This list is checked by security when they first arrive so it may take a few days before they are able to call.
You can also exchange voicemails using the Prison Voicemail service.
Officers may listen to phone calls as a way of preventing crime and helping keep people safe.
You can send emails to someone in Lewes using the Email a Prisoner service.
Letters
You can write at any time.
Include the person’s name and prisoner number on the envelope. If you do not know their prisoner number, contact Lewes.
All post apart from legal letters will be opened and checked by officers.
Each week, prisoners can send 2 second class letters and one first class legal letter.
Send money and gifts
You can use the free and fast online service to send money to someone in prison.
You can no longer send money by bank transfer, cheque, postal order or send cash by post.
If you cannot use the online service, you may be able to apply for an exemption – for example if you:
- are unable to use a computer, a smart phone or the internet
- do not have a debit card
This will allow you to send money by post.
Gifts and parcels
You are currently not permitted to bring any items into the HMP Lewes for the person you are visiting.
Our processes here at Lewes enable all prisoners to apply for items to be sent in, items that are appropriate to their IEP Level and current status; remanded or convicted.
Process
To have Items sent in, prisoners are required to submit an application to the Reception Team, outlining what they are requesting to have sent in.
The Reception Team will review the applications and will either approve or reject it. The application will then be return to the prisoner on his wing.
If the application is approved, it will be returned to the prisoner and a copy sent to the Gate Lodge ‘the entrance into HMP Lewes’. Only once the prisoner receives an approved application, should they ask the person family member or friend, to send them the items. Please note that when sending a parcel into HMP Lewes, you are required record your (the sender) name and return address on the outside of the packing. You are also required to clearly list all the items that are within the parcel, also on the outside of the parcel.
However, all books can be sent directly to the prisoner without the prisoner having to submit an application. This includes books purchased form one of the ‘Approved Retailers’, but senders are advised to clearly identify the contents as ‘Books’ with their name and return address on the outside of the parcel.
Approved Retailers
- Blackwell
- Foyles Waterstones
- Mr B’s Emporium of reading delights
- Wordery
- H Smiths
- Housman’s
- Incentive plus
- Prisons Org UK
Any book purchased form a retailer not on the approved retailers list, must not be sent directly to the prisoner at HMP Lewes. These books must be sent directly to the family member/friend, who will then need to send the books to the prisoner as described above.
Prisoner are permitted to apply for items to be sent in during their first 28 days at HMP Lewes. Thereafter all prisoners may ask for further items to be sent in once every 12 months, or when they have been awarded Enhanced IEP (Incentives and Earned Privileges)
A full list of approved retailers can be found on – HMPPS Incentives Policy, Annex F.
HMP Lewes’s ‘facilities list’ tells you what is allowed in parcels and is available in the visitors centre.
All parcels will be x-rayed, checked by search dogs and tested for illicit drugs before handed over to the intended recipient.
Parcels or items within the parcel containing or contaminating, illicit items, will seized and handed to the police for further action.
Life at Lewes
Lewes is committed to providing a safe and educational environment where prisoners can learn new skills to help them on release.
Security and safeguarding
Every prisoner at Lewes has a right to feel safe. The staff are responsible for their safeguarding and welfare at all times.
For further information about what to do when you are worried or concerned about someone in prison visit the Prisoners’ Families helpline website.
Arrival and first night
When someone first arrives at Lewes, they will be able to contact a family member by phone. This could be quite late in the evening, depending on the time they arrive, and they are only allowed 2 minutes.
They will get to speak to someone who will check how they’re feeling and ask about any immediate health and wellbeing needs.
Induction
Each prisoner who arrives at Lewes gets an induction that lasts about a week. They will meet professionals who will help them with:
- health and wellbeing, including mental and sexual health
- any substance misuse issues, including drugs and alcohol
- personal development in custody and on release, including skills, education and training
- other support (sometimes called ‘interventions’), such as managing difficult emotions
Everyone also finds out about the rules, fire safety, and how things like calls and visits work.
Accommodation
Lewes holds 692 prisoners in a mixture of single and double cells.
Facilities include a gym, library, a healthcare unit, an onsite pharmacy and a multi-faith centre.
Education and work
Lewes provides a range of work, education and training facilities including IT, kitchen work, painting and decorating, barista work, food safety and preparation, waste management, horticulture, first aid and sports leadership.
A physical education programme is offered, as well as weekly library sessions and there are courses to reduce the risk of re-offending.
Temporary release
Applications for release on temporary licence (ROTL) can be submitted and are individually assessed.
Organisations Lewes works with
Lewes works with the Samaritans to train a team of ‘Listeners’ who are then available day and night for those who need additional support.
It also works with The Forward Trust, which offers help around substance misuse and delivers a number of ‘family ties workshops’. This is in partnership with Care UK and can offer detoxification, if necessary.
Lewes also works with Storybook Dads which helps dads create a bedtime story CD or DVD for their children.
Support for family and friends
Find out about advice and helplines for family and friends.
Support at Lewes
PACT delivers family services at Lewes, offering support and advice. It works alongside Sussex Prisoners’ Families, a community organisation which provides peer support and help in court.
Concerns, problems and complaints
In an emergency
Call 01273 785100 if you think a prisoner is at immediate risk of harm. Ask for the Orderly Officer and explain that your concern is an emergency.
| Contact category | Phone number | Additional information |
| Non-emergency | 01273 785392 | Call this number if you have concerns about a prisoner’s safety or wellbeing which are serious but not life-threatening or complete a safer custody contact form on the Prisoners’ Families Helpline website. |
| Staff Integrity Hotline |
0800 917 6877 (24 hours answering machine) |
This number can be called anonymously. If you are concerned about a prisoner being bullied by a member of staff, you can use this number. As this line is managed separately from the prison, you can call this number anonymously. |
| Prisoners’ Families Helpline | 0808 808 2003 | The Prisoners’ Families Helpline can provide confidential support, advice and guidance. |
| Unwanted Prisoner Contact | 0300 060 6699 |
If a prisoner is contacting you and you want them to stop, you can use the Unwanted Prisoner Contact Service.
You can complete the Stop prisoner contact online form, email unwantedprisonercontact@justice.gov.uk or contact by phone. |
Problems and complaints
If you have any other problem contact Lewes.
Inspection reports
HM Prison and Probation Service publishes action plans for Lewes in response to independent inspections.
Telephone: 01273 785 100 Monday to Friday, 7am to 8pm and weekends, 7am to 5pm There is a 24 hour redirect service outside these hours Fax: 01273 785 101
Email: Correspondence.Lewes@justice.gov.uk
Address
HMP/YOI Lewes
1 Brighton Road
Lewes
East Sussex
BN7 1EA
Independent Monitoring Board
The law requires every prison to be monitored by an independent Board appointed by the Justice Secretary; these are known as Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs). The IMB must satisfy itself as to the humane and just treatment of those held in custody within its prison and the range and adequacy of the programmes preparing them for release; it must report annually to the Justice Secretary on how well the prison has met the standards and requirements placed on it.
Latest IMB Annual Report
1 February 2025 to 31 January 2026
Published : 17th June 2026
Key points
Main findings
Safety
The Board considers that the prison’s reception and induction processes work well but is concerned that the requirement at times to accept prisoners arriving late in the evening can present safety risks and cause stress to prisoners and staff alike.
Prisoner self-harm has reduced by around one third, a welcome reversal of the upward trend of recent years, but the Board still monitors unsatisfactory practice with regard to ACCT processes, designed to better support at-risk prisoners.
The level of violence is generally stable and given the improved regime shows a significant decline in incidents per unlock hour. Prisoner on prisoner assaults rose by 7% and assaults on staff by one case, to 80 incidents. The fall of 13% in the number of recorded use of force incidents is welcome.
The Board recognises the efforts made by the prison to prevent the entry of illicit items, but is concerned that illicit drugs remain too readily available on the wings.
Fair and humane treatment
The Board recognises the prison’s efforts to maintain an effective heating and hot water supply, but the current arrangements are unsatisfactory, unreliable and costly.
The Board notes the increase in the number of recorded key working sessions but also the slow progress to deliver key work in line with national standards.
Prisoners submitted 1,343 formal complaints to the prison in 2025, and the Board notes that complaints have increased by around 50% in just two years.
Health and wellbeing
The Board welcomes the increase in the number of hours that prisoners are out of cell on weekdays, and notes how this helps to promote a better atmosphere overall.
The Board welcomes the reduction in healthcare waiting times, notably for psychiatry, but remains concerned that prisoners with acute mental health needs who need to move to a secure mental health facility can face long delays because of limited provision of such facilities nationally.
The Board notes that healthcare concerns made up the largest proportion of applications for support made by prisoners to the IMB, 25% (107) of the total.
Progression and resettlement
The Board is disappointed to note the 60% budget reduction for the education service made last year and the negative impact this has had on the range of provision for prisoners.
The prison’s offender management unit (OMU) continues to perform well in the face of sustained legislative change and of increasingly complex release arrangements.
The Board is concerned about the impact that releasing prisoners to no fixed abode can have on the wellbeing of the prisoners involved and on the wider community.
Main areas for development
TO THE MINISTER
- The Board is concerned that illicit drugs are too readily available in the prison. What additional measures might the Minister consider to help reinforce and strengthen the prison’s responses to this ongoing problem?
- The Board is concerned that too many prisoners are released to no fixed abode. Will the Minister work with colleagues across government to help improve community provision and support for such prisoners?
TO THE PRISON SERVICE
- The Board is concerned that the prison at times is required to accept prisoners arriving late in the evening and about the safety risks and stress that this can cause. What new measures might the service consider to help alleviate this ongoing problem?
TO THE GOVERNOR
- The Board considers that practice with regard to ACCT processes, designed to better support at-risk prisoners, could be strengthened. Will the Governor consider new measures to help improve practice in this area?
To read the full report click the tab below…
HMIP Latest Inspection Report
Date of last inspection: 9th -19 June 2025
Date of publication: 8th September 2025
Summary of key findings
We assess outcomes for prisoners against four healthy prison tests: safety, respect, purposeful activity, and preparation for release (see Appendix I for more information about the tests). We also include a commentary on leadership in the prison
At this inspection of HMP Lewes, we found that outcomes for prisoners were:
- not sufficiently good for safety
- reasonably good for respect
- not sufficiently good for purposeful activity
- reasonably good for preparation for release
HMCIP Executive Summary
Introduction
Built in the 19th century, HMP Lewes in Sussex is a category B reception and resettlement prison for adult men, holding 558 prisoners at the time of this inspection. The population is characterised by high turnover, with 65% of prisoners on remand or unsentenced and 85% having been at the prison for less than six months. A recurring theme of our inspection was the significant operational challenges this fact creates, particularly in delivering consistent support, purposeful activity, and effective resettlement planning.
Overall, however, we found a prison that, commendably, was evidencing very clear progress. In our healthy prison tests, we judged outcomes to be ‘reasonably good’ for respect and preparation for release; both improvements compared to our previous 2024 inspection. For safety and purposeful activity, outcomes were assessed as ‘not sufficiently good’, although this too marked an improvement in the purposeful activity test.
Progress had also been made in reducing violence and improving early days support, but self-harm rates remained high, and safeguarding arrangements were inconsistent. The prison had revised its early days processes, seeking feedback from new arrivals, but late arrivals and poor privacy during safety interviews hindered both the support the prison was able to give and the identification of risk. The use of force had increased, and although oversight had improved, data was not always used effectively to support accountability or identify learning.
Staff-prisoner relationships were a clear strength, with 80% of prisoners reporting respectful treatment by staff. The key worker scheme had improved in coverage but remained inconsistent in quality and frequency. Living conditions varied widely, but while the innovative Lewes Assurance and Multi-Skills (LAMS) prisoner team had refurbished many areas to a good standard, much of the infrastructure remained in poor condition, with graffiti, damaged fittings, and unreliable heating and hot water. Food quality and quantity were a source of significant dissatisfaction, and the applications system was ineffective, leading to frustration and delays in resolving basic issues.
Equality and inclusion work had stalled since the last inspection. Forums for prisoners with protected characteristics were poorly attended and had limited impact. Disparities in treatment, particularly for black and minority ethnic prisoners, remained unaddressed. However, support for neurodivergent prisoners was a notable strength, with a dedicated unit (K wing) offering tailored support from trained staff. The chaplaincy team played a strong and influential role in supporting inclusion and rehabilitation, including for young adults and foreign nationals.
Although time out of cell had improved and the regime was more reliable, 40% of prisoners remained unemployed. Ofsted assessed the overall effectiveness of education, skills, and work as requiring improvement. Attendance at activity was inconsistent, and while the curriculum was broadly appropriate, teaching quality varied, and some tutors failed to stretch more able learners. The of their skill development. The gym and library were well used and offered a range of activities, but recreational opportunities on the wings were limited.
Leaders had responded proactively to the significant and relatively recent rise in the number of remanded and short-stay prisoners by introducing a new strategy and improving coordination between departments. The pre-release team was well led, and initiatives such as the pre-release café and through-the-gate mentoring showed promise. However, 20% of prisoners were still released homeless, and the lack of a strategic housing lead remained a significant gap. Support for obtaining ID and right-to-work documents had improved, with over 600 prisoners assisted in the past year.
We were impressed by the leadership at Lewes. The governor and senior team had maintained a clear set of priorities and fostered a more proactive and collaborative culture that had seen staff morale rise and retention improve. The prison felt calm, ordered and purposeful, and while there was clearly much to do with significant strategic and infrastructure challenges to overcome, there was a confident, can-do approach fostered among leaders that gave us a confidence that the prison could continue to improve.
Charlie Taylor
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons
July 2025
Independent Review of Progress Report
Date of last inspection: 2–4 December 2019
Date of publication: 16 January 2020
Key findings:
- At this IRP visit, we followed up 12 of the 53 recommendations made at our most recent inspection and made judgements about the degree of progress achieved to date. Ofsted followed up three themes.
- We judged that there was good progress in three recommendations, reasonable progress in six recommendations, and insufficient progress in three recommendations. There was no meaningful progress in any of the recommendations. A summary of the judgements is as follows.

4 This pie chart excludes any recommendations that were followed up as part of a theme within Ofsted’s concurrent prison monitoring visit.
Figure 2: Judgements against HMI Prisons recommendations from 2019 inspection
| Recommendation | Judgement |
| The prison should develop a comprehensive violence reduction action plan, which is driven forward by a sufficiently resourced safer custody team and regularly monitored to establish its effectiveness. (S39) | Reasonable progress |
| The prison should implement a strategy to reduce self-harm, which is based on a robust analysis of self-harm data and delivers consistently good care for prisoners at risk of self-harm through multidisciplinary assessment, care in custody and teamwork (ACCT) case management. (S40) | Reasonable progress |
| Health governance structures should be robust enough to identify and effectively address key risks and concerns and should ensure that prisoners have prompt access to all health services. (S41) | Reasonable progress |
| There should be a prison-wide approach to offender management, based on a robust needs analysis. It should include effective joint working and information exchange, a common approach to record-keeping, and a detailed strategy for managing the large number of sex offenders. (S43) | Reasonable progress |
| Rigorous governance of use of force should ensure that documentation is completed promptly and thoroughly, and that all planned incidents are recorded. (1.27) | Good progress |
| Measures to identify and control drug supply, including suspicion testing and use of technology, should be implemented systematically. (1.43) | Reasonable progress |
| Managers should ensure that staff actively support prisoners and challenge poor behaviour. (2.3) | Insufficient progress |
| Cells, wings and outside areas should be kept clean. (2.10) | Reasonable progress |
| All health care staff should receive regular clinical and managerial supervision and be up to date with mandatory training. (2.52) | Good progress |
| Prisoners with long-term health conditions should receive regular reviews by trained staff, informed by an evidence-based care plan. (2.70) | Insufficient progress |
| Prisoners referred to the service should be reviewed and assessed promptly and offered a suitable range of mental health interventions within agreed timescales. (2.86) | Good progress |
| All eligible prisoners should have an up-to-date OASys assessment. Offender management should proactively engage prisoners and focus on progression and the reduction of risk of harm. (4.15) | Insufficient progress |
- Ofsted judged that there was reasonable progress in one theme and insufficient progress in two themes. The was significant progress in none of the themes.

Figure 4: Judgements against Ofsted themes5 from 2019 inspection
| Ofsted theme | Judgement |
| What progress have leaders and managers made with their strategies to improve the provision of education, skills and work, ensuring that all prisoners are adequately allocated to activities, enabling them to participate in training and qualifications that increase their chances of employability on release? | Insufficient |
| What progress have leaders and managers made in improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment for all groups of learners, ensuring that teachers plan learning to enable prisoners to make good progress, using good learning resources and developing prisoners’ English and mathematics skills? | Reasonable |
| What progress have leaders and managers made in securing good quality work provision that enables prisoners to develop a work ethic and in ensuring that a high number of prisoners complete their qualifications and achieve well? | Insufficient |
5 Ofsted’s themes incorporate the key concerns at the previous inspection in respect of education, skills and work.
Section 1. Chief Inspector's Summary
1.1 At our inspection of HMP Lewes in 2019 we made the following judgements about outcomes for prisoners.

1.2 HMP Lewes in East Sussex is a medium-sized category B local prison. Its main function is to serve the local courts by holding unsentenced and newly sentenced prisoners. The average length of stay is short at about nine weeks. In addition to this core function, the prison holds recalled prisoners and those with a variety of sentence lengths, including lifers and those convicted of sexual offences. Like many other local prisons, it dates from the Victorian era and much of its infrastructure is old and cramped.
1.3 When we inspected the prison in January 2019, it had been in ‘special measures’ for two years, but outcomes for prisoners were declining rather than improving. A great deal of urgent work was needed to improve safety. The number of assaults against staff was high, a fifth of all assaults were serious and a quarter of prisoners said they felt unsafe. Despite this, the prison lacked an effective strategy for reducing violence. Force was used frequently, but its oversight was poor, and far too much paperwork justifying its use was missing. Illicit drugs were a big security problem, yet the prison had not done enough to identify or control their supply. Self-harm was common and five prisoners had taken their own lives between our 2016 and 2019 inspections. Again, the prison lacked an adequate strategic response to this problem. Many prisoners reported that staff treated them with respect, but a number of officers lacked authority and were too passive in their interactions with prisoners. Cleanliness on wings was generally poor and there were rats and large amounts of bird droppings in outside areas. We found very real weaknesses in the leadership and management of health services. These deficiencies meant our colleagues in the Care Quality Commission issued requirement notices relating to three breaches of the commission’s regulations. Mental health services, nurse-led primary care and care for prisoners with long- term conditions were poor. Ofsted judged the overall effectiveness of education, skills and work provision as inadequate, its lowest score. Teaching and prisoners’ learning were not good enough. Too many prisoners were unemployed, with only enough activity places for two-thirds of the population. Prison managers were aware of these problems but did not have a clear strategy for improving learning and skills. Not enough was done to reduce the risks of prisoners reoffending after release. More than 100 assessments of prisoners’ risks were out of date or had not been completed. Prison departments did not work closely to reduce prisoners’ risks and had not adequately analysed the population’s needs. As in many other areas of the prison, there was no overarching strategy for driving improvement in this area.
1.4 During this independent review of progress, we found a prison with a renewed sense of purpose and direction. The prison had been taken out of special measures and had discarded the associated bureaucracy and ineffective action plan. The governor and her senior managers understood our concerns and recommendations, and had formulated a more realistic and focused plan for improvement. We were pleased to find that the prison had made good or reasonably good progress in two-thirds of the areas that we reviewed during this visit.
1.5 The prison had consulted staff and prisoners about what was causing violence in the prison. This consultation had informed a revised safety strategy and action plan. The safer custody team was now better resourced. However, these positive developments had yet to translate into reduced levels of violence. There were in fact now more assaults against staff than at the time of the inspection.
1.6 Managers now had much better oversight of the use of force than at the inspection. Nearly all planned incidents were video-recorded and the amount of outstanding paperwork justifying the use of force had been greatly reduced.
1.7 The number of prisoners testing positive in random drug tests had fallen. Prison staff were making much better use of technology and search dogs to disrupt the supply of drugs. However, staff were still not carrying out enough targeted drug tests following the receipt of intelligence.
1.8 The number of self-harm incidents in the previous six months had declined by over a third compared to a similar period before the inspection. One prisoner had taken their own life following our inspection. Managers had used an analysis of self-harm data to inform a new comprehensive strategy but had yet to publish it. Despite regular quality assurance, assessment, care in custody and team work documentation for those at risk of suicide or self-harm required improvement.
1.9 Managers assertively challenged prisoners’ antisocial behaviour, but officers’ approaches were not always consistent. Despite this, officers were generally supportive of prisoners in their care.
1.10 Managers now paid more attention to cleanliness and hygiene, and overall standards had improved. The problem with rats had been tackled. Offensive displays were no longer visible and graffiti had been reduced. Despite these improvements, some showers were run down and dirty, while many communal areas remained untidy.
1.11 Health governance structures had improved, and health care staff now received clinical and managerial supervision. Care for prisoners with long-term health conditions had also improved but was undermined by the large number of prisoners who did not attend their appointments. The mental health service was better than at the inspection, and more interventions were available.
1.12 There were still insufficient activity places for the population and some prisoners remained unemployed for more than two months. Officers did not routinely challenge prisoners who chose not to attend an activity. The overall quality of teaching, learning and assessment had improved. Prisoners could now study short modules in English and mathematics, which were better suited to the prison with its high turnover of prisoners. However, not enough prisoners benefited from work-related qualifications.
1.13 The prison had published an offender management strategy and established a committee to improve joint working and information sharing between departments involved in prisoners’ rehabilitation. The prison held fewer registered sex offenders than before and had implemented a sensible strategy for managing the population and ensuring prisoners progressed to a more suitable prison.
1.14 The number of prisoners without an offender assessment system (OASys) report had been reduced, but the prison could not tell us how many OASys assessments needed to be reviewed. While some offender management unit staff had frequent, good quality contact with prisoners on their caseload, others did not. Proactive interactions with prisoners were hampered by staff shortages and a lack of suitable interview rooms.
1.15 Overall, this was a promising review. The governor and her senior managers were taking the prison in the right direction. They were realistic about the scale of the challenges they faced and understood that further progress would require sustained effort and vigour. Their challenge now is to build on the progress they have made since the inspection and to translate this work into positive outcomes for prisoners. Nevertheless, they should be congratulated on what they have achieved so far.
Peter Clarke CVO OBE QPM
December 2019
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons
Facilities Lists
Introduction
A prison’s Facilities List is an important document.
What personal items a prisoner may be allowed to have with them in their cell in a particular prison, the amount they can have of each item, and the mechanism by which they must obtain those items is governed by the prison’s ‘Facilities List’ – each prison’s Facilities List is unique to each prison.
Whether a prisoner can have a particular item on a prison’s Facilities List depends on their status as a remand or convicted prisoner, their level on the Incentive Earned Privileges Scheme, and Volumetric Control limits. Full details of the Incentive Earned Privileges Scheme and Volumetric Control Limits are in the ‘Reception to Release’ Advice Portal, available to Standard Members and above.
Fatal Incident Reports
Details of people who have died in this prison, with copies of the Investigation Report into their deaths, and the Action Plan designed to prevent further similar deaths – all listed by the name of the deceased that is not available anywhere else.