HMP & YOI Lewes

HMP & YOI Lewes

1 Brighton Rd, Lewes East Sussex, BN7 1EA

Tel: 01273 785100

Fax: 01273 785101

Governor: Mark Creaven

This is just one of the 122 prison establishment entries that we have on The Prison Oracle.

Each one is updated immediately new information such as an Inspection or IMB Report is available, and you can access all the others establishment entries, along with 44,000 pages of other prison-related information, for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week – Learn More

Latest News

This section is designed to give you a quick overview of the events, reports, concerns and news items concerning this establishment – only The Prison Oracle gives you this; simple just as it should be!

2025

30th July : Legal and professional visits booking details updatedLearn More

8th July: Latest IMB report published – Learn More 

2nd January: see ‘Visiting Information’ below for updated Early Days visits, and ‘Dress Code’ for banned clothing brands


2024

18th December: Professional and virtual visits updated – see ‘Visiting Information’ below

14th May: Prison Inspection report published Learn More

4th April: inquest highlights ‘failures in communication’Learn More

27th March: Inmates in hospital with suspected food poisoning – Learn More

2025

Description of the establishment

Category B or lower/ Young Offenders suitable for closed conditions or lower (not Restricted Status)

HMP Lewes is a reception and resettlement category B local prison for adult and young adult prisoners. It mostly serves the courts of East and West Sussex and holds sentenced and unsentenced prisoners, prisoners on remand and young adults (age 18 to 21) in categories B and C. It also takes some category D prisoners returned from open conditions and holds people whose prison sentences have been completed but are detained under Home Office powers prior to deportation. 

The prison’s operational capacity (maximum accommodated without risk of disruption due to overcrowding) at the end of January 2025 was 6201: at that time, the prison held 581 prisoners: twelve months earlier, it was holding 554 prisoners. 

The prison is located in the East Sussex county town of Lewes. Its main buildings, with five residential wings, were completed in 1853. A modern block, with two residential wings, opened in 2008. There are seven residential wings in total, plus a healthcare wing and a care and separation unit used to segregate prisoners. Details of the accommodation are as follows: 

  • A wing: a general wing for drug recovery, housing up to 125 prisoners. 
  • B wing: the care and separation unit (CSU) for segregating prisoners, with 16 cells, including two where a prisoner can be kept under constant supervision by a member of staff to reduce the risk of suicide or self-harm, and two special accommodation cells where items such as furniture, bedding and sanitation are removed in the interests of prisoner safety. 
  • C wing: a general wing, housing up to 150 prisoners. 
  • F wing: for vulnerable prisoners, housing up to 147 prisoners; also used to house a small number of newly arrived prisoners when the early days centre (L wing) is full. 
  • G wing: for prisoners on enhanced status (the top level of the prison’s incentives scheme to reward good behaviour through increased privileges), housing up to 23. This became an incentivised drug free living unit as the IMB’s reporting period closed. 
  • K wing: a designated neurodiverse unit (NDU) housing up to 22 prisoners. 
  • L wing: the early days centre for newly arrived prisoners, with single cells housing up to 80 prisoners. 
  • M wing: a general wing of single cells housing up to 94 prisoners. 
  • Acute inpatient care unit in the healthcare centre (HCC) for up to nine prisoners. 

There is a large, well-equipped gym and a second sports hall for prisoner use, as well as a multi-faith centre and various workshops. 

The main providers of services to the prison were: Serco (transport to courts and local prisons); Gov Facility Services Ltd/GFSL (facilities’ management in prisons across southern England); DHL (ordering and delivering prisoners’ purchases); Bidfood (kitchen supplies); East Sussex County Council (library services and social care); Milton Keynes College (for education); HM Prison and Probation Service; Southdown Housing; Jobcentre Plus; Pact (Prison Advice and Care Trust), providing family support services. 

There are three contracted providers of health and social care: 

  • Practice Plus Group (PPG) is the main provider, contracted via NHS commissioners to deliver primary care, including GP services and health screening, inpatient care, substance misuse, mental health, pharmacy and crisis response services. Subcontractors provide dentistry, optician, podiatry and physiotherapy services. 
  • East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, in partnership with PPG, provides sexual health clinics and screening programmes, such as those for abdominal aortic aneurysm, bowel cancer and diabetic retinopathy. 
  • Agincare (contracted through East Sussex County Council social care services) is responsible for social care. 

A number of voluntary and other organisations provide services. These include: 

  • Samaritans 
  • SSAFA (the armed forces charity) 
  • National Association of Official Prison Visitors 
  • Prison Family Support (local charity that works to reduce the impact imprisonment has on children of offenders in custody at HMP Lewes) 
  • Sussex Pathways (charity that works in prisons and communities to help reduce offending behaviour) 
  • Prison Fellowship (Christian-based charity supporting prisoners) 
  • Advocacy People (charity that supports prisoners with healthcare complaints) 
  • LOSRAS (Lewes Organisation in Support of Refugees and Asylum Seekers) 
  • Shannon Trust (national charity that works to train and inspire prisoners who can read to teach those that can’t) 
  • Change Grow Live (CGL) (a charity that helps people change the direction of their lives, grow as individuals, and live life to its full potential) 
  • Reconnect (care after custody service that seeks to improve continuity of care for people with an identified health need) 
  • Interventions Alliance (supports people to overcome barriers and foster personal wellbeing) 
  • Stone Pillow (homeless charity) 
  • ADDER (addiction, diversion, disruption, enforcement and recovery) 
  • AfEO (accommodation for ex-offenders). 
  • CXK, an organisation contracted by HMPPS to give careers advice and prepare learning plans. 

Visiting information –  2025

Book and plan your visit to Lewes

To visit someone in Lewes you must:

  • be on that person’s visitor list
  • book your visit at least 24 hours in advance
  • have the required ID with you when you go

At least one visitor must be 18 or older at every visit.

There may be a limit to the number of visits a prisoner can have. You can check this with Lewes.

Contact Lewes if you have more questions about visiting.

Help with the cost of your visit

If you get certain benefits or have an NHS health certificate, you might be able to get help with the costs of your visit, including:

  • travel to Lewes
  • somewhere to stay overnight
  • meals

How to book family and friends visits

You can book your visit online.

You must arrive at least 45 minutes before your visit to allow for security and processing.

HMP Lewes is able to offer social and professional visits for those with mobility concerns, please email SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk, if you require support with your visit due to mobility concerns. If you require to change any information on your online booking please contact SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk with your requests.

Visiting times

  • Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday: 2pm to 3:30pm

All face-to-face official visits must be booked via email: legalvisits.lewes@justice.gov.uk

All official video links must be booked via Videolink.lewes@justice.gov.uk

(Video links cannot be booked over the phone.)

Visiting times:

  • Monday, 2pm to 4pm
  • Tuesday, 2pm to 4pm
  • Wednesday, 9am to 11:30am
  • Thursday, 2pm to 4pm
  • Friday, 9am to 11:30am
  • Saturday, 2pm to 4pm
  • Sunday, 9am to 11:30am, 2pm to 4pm

How to Book Early Days Visits – January 2025

Anybody who is newly convicted (Not on recall or remand) can have an early day visit subject to availability. They are first come, first serve. This will take place within 72 hours and will be available for up to 3 visitors only above the age of 18.

Visitors can request to book these by emailing SocialVisits.Lewes@justice.gov.uk.

There is also limited availability to use Prison video app for those that can not visit in person.

Visiting times:

  • Wednesday, Friday and Sunday: 9am to 11:30am

Getting to Lewes

The closest railway station is Lewes. You can get a 5 minute taxi ride to the prison or it’s a 25 minute walk.

To plan your journey by public transport:

Only Blue Badge holders can park at the prison. There are 2 spaces next to the visitors centre. Tell the prison staff you are parking here, show them your Blue Badge and give them your vehicle registration number. Visitors centre staff can help you with this.

There is metered parking on the roads outside the prison.

Entering Lewes

prison. Read the list of acceptable forms of ID when visiting a prison.

  • All visitors go through our EGS (Enhanced Gate Security) this process is similar to airport security. (bag x-ray and metal portals) all visitors can be subject to a pat-down search, including children
  • You may also be sniffed by security dogs
  • Visitors must adhere to the prison dress code that applies when entering Lewes, please see dress code below
  • There are strict controls on what you can take into Lewes. You will have to leave all the things you have with you in a locker, apart from items required for infants and medication is subject the individual concerned and to our security processes. Lewes is cash only and each adult visitor can take up to £25 in £10, £5 or coins. (No £20 notes) each, to spend on hot and cold refreshments throughout the duration of your visit
  • When visiting your partner, family member or friend, there is an expectation that you will remain polite and respectful to all other visitors and all staff. HMP Lewes has the right to deny entry or terminate a visit if a visitor is offensive or aggressive towards any other visitor, prisoner, or member of staff

Dress code

The following items of clothing will not be allowed to enter HMP Lewes:

  • Steel toe-capped boots or shoes with exposed metal parts, Cycle or Motorcycle shoes or boots
  • Gloves, Hats, scarves or any headgear that is not worn on religious grounds. (Baby’s bonnets are acceptable but must be removed by parent for searching)
  • Sunglasses (unless prescription glasses)
  • Smart watches of any kind, including fitness trackers
  • Any item of clothing that has offensive, racial or sexist logos, words or pictures
  • No clothing made by Hoodrich, Criminal Damage, AYEgear
  • Excessively revealing, i.e. very short skirts/dresses including shorts, see through tops, crop tops and strapless tops, unitard jumpsuit/ tight jumpsuit
  • Visible or exposed underwear of any kind (With exception of brassier straps in the shoulder area)
  • Ripped clothing for the torso
  • Ripped jeans above the knee will not be allowed
  • Excessively large metal hair accessories
  • Helmets of any kind (Except medical issue)

Clothing cannot be removed during the visits session and visitors are to make sure they are comfortably dressed before they enter the visitor searching area.

This list is not exhaustive. All enquiries should be directed in the first instance to the staff in the Visits booking or Visits Senior officer.

Visiting facilities

PACT runs the visitors centre with toys and art materials and a small play area for children. Refreshments will be available to purchase during your visit.

If you have a disability, let the prison know and they will make sure your visit is on the lower level.

Family visits

HMP Lewes have introduced a new approach to Family Visits which were previously known as Family Days.

Each day will be split into two sessions, one held in the morning, and one held in the afternoon. Although the Family Visits will be shorter (3 hours per session) having two sessions will support more prisoners having the opportunity to apply for these events and spending time with loved ones.

  • All visitors must be on the prisoners approved visitors list
  • Children are considered an adult from their 18th birthday
  • Applications are submitted by the prisoners and considered by the Family Visits Committee
  • Applications are considered individually, taking into account a number of points including, the available space within the Visits Hall
  • HMP Lewes is governed by the Health and Safety regulations in relations to the overall number of people permitted in the Visits Hall at any one time
  • This overall figure will also include Staff and PACT
  • Session times will be from 9am to 12pm and 2pm to 5pm
  • The new model permits up to 20 prisoners and their families to take part in the event on each session
  • Activities for children will be available
  • Light refreshments will also be provided by PACT, and the Snack Shop will also be open as usual where your families can purchase light refreshments

Keep in touch with someone at Lewes

There are several ways you can keep in touch with someone during their time at Lewes.

Secure video calls

To have a secure video call with someone in this prison you need to:

  • Download the Prison Video app
  • Create an account
  • Register all visitors
  • Add the prisoner to your contact list.

How to book a secure video call

You can request a secure video call with someone in this prison via the Prison Video app.

You will receive a notification when your request has been accepted.

Read more about how it works

Phone calls

Prisoners have phones in their cells but they will always have to call you. They buy phone credits to do this and can call anytime between 6am and midnight.

They can phone anyone named on their list of friends and family. This list is checked by security when they first arrive so it may take a few days before they are able to call.

You can also exchange voicemails using the Prison Voicemail service.

Officers may listen to phone calls as a way of preventing crime and helping keep people safe.

Email

You can send emails to someone in Lewes using the Email a Prisoner service.

Letters

You can write at any time.

Include the person’s name and prisoner number on the envelope. If you do not know their prisoner number, contact Lewes.

All post apart from legal letters will be opened and checked by officers.

Each week, prisoners can send 2 second class letters and one first class legal letter.

Send money and gifts

You can use the free and fast online service to send money to someone in prison.

You can no longer send money by bank transfer, cheque, postal order or send cash by post.

If you cannot use the online service, you may be able to apply for an exemption – for example if you:

  • are unable to use a computer, a smart phone or the internet
  • do not have a debit card

This will allow you to send money by post.

Gifts and parcels

You are currently not permitted to bring any items into the HMP Lewes for the person you are visiting.

Our processes here at Lewes enable all prisoners to apply for items to be sent in, items that are appropriate to their IEP Level and current status; remanded or convicted.

Process

To have Items sent in, prisoners are required to submit an application to the Reception Team, outlining what they are requesting to have sent in.

The Reception Team will review the applications and will either approve or reject it. The application will then be return to the prisoner on his wing.

If the application is approved, it will be returned to the prisoner and a copy sent to the Gate Lodge ‘the entrance into HMP Lewes’. Only once the prisoner receives an approved application, should they ask the person family member or friend, to send them the items. Please note that when sending a parcel into HMP Lewes, you are required record your (the sender) name and return address on the outside of the packing. You are also required to clearly list all the items that are within the parcel, also on the outside of the parcel.

However, all books can be sent directly to the prisoner without the prisoner having to submit an application. This includes books purchased form one of the ‘Approved Retailers’, but senders are advised to clearly identify the contents as ‘Books’ with their name and return address on the outside of the parcel.

Approved Retailers

  • Blackwell
  • Foyles Waterstones
  • Mr B’s Emporium of reading delights
  • Wordery
  • H Smiths
  • Housman’s
  • Incentive plus
  • Prisons Org UK

Any book purchased form a retailer not on the approved retailers list, must not be sent directly to the prisoner at HMP Lewes. These books must be sent directly to the family member/friend, who will then need to send the books to the prisoner as described above.

Prisoner are permitted to apply for items to be sent in during their first 28 days at HMP Lewes. Thereafter all prisoners may ask for further items to be sent in once every 12 months, or when they have been awarded Enhanced IEP (Incentives and Earned Privileges)

A full list of approved retailers can be found on – HMPPS Incentives Policy, Annex F.

HMP Lewes’s ‘facilities list’ tells you what is allowed in parcels and is available in the visitors centre.

All parcels will be x-rayed, checked by search dogs and tested for illicit drugs before handed over to the intended recipient.

Parcels or items within the parcel containing or contaminating, illicit items, will seized and handed to the police for further action.

Life at Lewes

Lewes is committed to providing a safe and educational environment where prisoners can learn new skills to help them on release.

Security and safeguarding

Every prisoner at Lewes has a right to feel safe. The staff are responsible for their safeguarding and welfare at all times.

For further information about what to do when you are worried or concerned about someone in prison visit the Prisoners’ Families helpline website.

Arrival and first night

When someone first arrives at Lewes, they will be able to contact a family member by phone. This could be quite late in the evening, depending on the time they arrive, and they are only allowed 2 minutes.

They will get to speak to someone who will check how they’re feeling and ask about any immediate health and wellbeing needs.

Induction

Each prisoner who arrives at Lewes gets an induction that lasts about a week. They will meet professionals who will help them with:

  • health and wellbeing, including mental and sexual health
  • any substance misuse issues, including drugs and alcohol
  • personal development in custody and on release, including skills, education and training
  • other support (sometimes called ‘interventions’), such as managing difficult emotions

Everyone also finds out about the rules, fire safety, and how things like calls and visits work.

Accommodation

Lewes holds 692 prisoners in a mixture of single and double cells.

Facilities include a gym, library, a healthcare unit, an onsite pharmacy and a multi-faith centre.

Education and work

Lewes provides a range of work, education and training facilities including IT, kitchen work, painting and decorating, barista work, food safety and preparation, waste management, horticulture, first aid and sports leadership.

A physical education programme is offered, as well as weekly library sessions and there are courses to reduce the risk of re-offending.

Temporary release

Applications for release on temporary licence (ROTL) can be submitted and are individually assessed.

Organisations Lewes works with

Lewes works with the Samaritans to train a team of ‘Listeners’ who are then available day and night for those who need additional support.

It also works with The Forward Trust, which offers help around substance misuse and delivers a number of ‘family ties workshops’. This is in partnership with Care UK and can offer detoxification, if necessary.

Lewes also works with Storybook Dads which helps dads create a bedtime story CD or DVD for their children.

Support for family and friends

Find out about advice and helplines for family and friends.

Support at Lewes

PACT delivers family services at Lewes, offering support and advice. It works alongside Sussex Prisoners’ Families, a community organisation which provides peer support and help in court.

Concerns, problems and complaints

In an emergency

Call 01273 785100 if you think a prisoner is at immediate risk of harm. Ask for the Orderly Officer and explain that your concern is an emergency.

Contact category Phone number Additional information
Non-emergency 01273 785392 Call this number if you have concerns about a prisoner’s safety or wellbeing which are serious but not life-threatening or complete a safer custody contact form on the Prisoners’ Families Helpline website.
Staff Integrity Hotline 0800 917 6877

(24 hours answering machine)

This number can be called anonymously. If you are concerned about a prisoner being bullied by a member of staff, you can use this number. As this line is managed separately from the prison, you can call this number anonymously.
Prisoners’ Families Helpline 0808 808 2003 The Prisoners’ Families Helpline can provide confidential support, advice and guidance.
Unwanted Prisoner Contact 0300 060 6699 If a prisoner is contacting you and you want them to stop, you can use the Unwanted Prisoner Contact Service.

 

You can complete the Stop prisoner contact online form, email unwantedprisonercontact@justice.gov.uk or contact by phone.

Problems and complaints

If you have any other problem contact Lewes.

Inspection reports

HM Prison and Probation Service publishes action plans for Lewes in response to independent inspections.

Telephone: 01273 785 100
Monday to Friday, 7am to 8pm and weekends, 7am to 5pm
There is a 24 hour redirect service outside these hours
Fax: 01273 785 101

Email: Correspondence.Lewes@justice.gov.uk

Address

HMP/YOI Lewes

1 Brighton Road

Lewes

East Sussex

BN7 1EA

Independent Monitoring Board

The law requires every prison to be monitored by an independent Board appointed by the Justice Secretary; these are known as Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs). The IMB must satisfy itself as to the humane and just treatment of those held in custody within its prison and the range and adequacy of the programmes preparing them for release; it must report annually to the Justice Secretary on how well the prison has met the standards and requirements placed on it.

Latest IMB Annual Report

1 February 2024 to  31 January 2025

Published : 8th July 2024

Key points 

Main findings 

Safety 

  • In the Board’s view the reception and induction processes for new prisoners have improved over our reporting period. 
  • There was a 16% fall in incidents of prisoner-on-prisoner violence, down to 194 compared with 232 the year before. The number said to be serious fell from 28 to 17. 
  • There was a 15% increase in the number of assaults on staff with 79 incidents, 12 of which were said to be serious, up from five in the previous year. 
  • The number of self-harm incidents rose from 620 to 651. The Board notes that the number of self-harm incidents has increased significantly over the past five years, but that last year’s 5% increase shows that the rate of increase has fallen. 
  • There were 721 incidents involving use of force recorded in the Board’s reporting period, a 25% increase over the previous period’s total of 581. 

Fair and humane treatment 

  • Areas of the prison have been refurbished, redecorated and are noticeably cleaner. 
  • Consistent and effective heating and hot water supply continues to be a problem and at times the wings have been unacceptably hot or cold for prisoners and staff alike. 
  • The Board notes a big increase in the recorded number of key working sessions but has been unable to confirm the quality and consistency of these sessions. 
  • Across the Board’s reporting year prisoners made 1,287 complaints to the prison: up from 906 in 2023/24, an increase of around 25%. 

Health and wellbeing 

  • The Board is pleased that time out of cell (regime) has increased and welcomes the general improvement this has made to day-to-day life for most prisoners. 
  • The Board has welcomed the reduction in waiting times for routine healthcare appointments and a general improvement in the quality of healthcare. 
  • However, the Board was troubled about gaps in psychiatry, especially in the summer of 2024, when there was in effect no psychiatrist in the prison. The Board would welcome greater mental health service provision at HMP Lewes going forward. 
  • The Board is again concerned about delays faced by prisoners who need to move to a secure mental health facility because of a shortage of such provision nationally. 

Progression and resettlement 

  • The Board welcomes the increase in places for work or education, but notes that most of these places are part-time and that there was a fall in attendance for education toward the end of 2024 around the time a new regime was introduced. 
  • The Board welcomes a new focus on the support needs of remand prisoners, and work that’s underway to develop a remand strategy. 

Main areas for development 

TO THE MINISTER 

  • Will the Minister work with government colleagues to ensure that the forthcoming Mental Health Bill identifies appropriate measures to improve care for prisoners with severe mental illness, including more provision in secure units, and ensure that these measures are properly resourced and delivered with minimum delay? 

TO THE PRISON SERVICE 

  • Will the service explore all options to enable the quickest possible replacement of the prison’s heating and hot water system and ensure, in the interim, that the Governor receives adequate resources to keep prisoners warm in winter? 
  • Will the service work with NHS colleagues to boost investment in mental health services in the prison and in particular review the adequacy of psychiatry provision? 

TO THE GOVERNOR 

  • Will the governor renew efforts to reduce incidents of self-harm, which have gone up by around one third over the past two years? 
  • Will the governor prioritise the development and implementation of the prison’s remand strategy to better support the needs of remand prisoners? 
  • Will the governor act to reverse the fall in prisoner attendance at education that’s been seen since the improvement in the prison’s regime in late 2024? 

To read the full report click the tab below…

Full IMB Annual Report

The Full IMB Annual Report is only available to our Enhanced and Corporate Members.

You can quickly upgrade your membership to Enhanced or Corporate by clicking the links above or you can compare all our memberships by clicking Upgrade Now below:

Upgrade Now

HMIP Latest Inspection Report

Date of last inspection: 5-16 February 2024

Date of publication: 14th May 2024

HMCIP Executive Summary

May 2024

Notable positive practice

We define notable positive practice as:

  • Evidence of our expectations being met to deliver particularly good outcomes for prisoners and/or particularly original or creative approaches to problem solving.
  • Inspectors found one example of notable positive practice during this inspection, which other prisons may be able to learn from or replicate. Unless otherwise specified, these examples are not formally evaluated, are a snapshot in time and may not be suitable for other establishments. They show some of the ways our expectations might be met, but are by no means the only way.

Example of notable positive practice

  • Prison Family Support, a small local organisation with enthusiastic caseworkers, helped prisoners from Lewes navigate contact with their children, complementing the family support work of PACT (Prison Advice and Care Trust). This included supporting their involvement at Child in Need conferences and guiding them through the process of their child being adopted.

Introduction

In 2022, our unannounced inspection of HMP Lewes was concerning enough for us to return for an independent review of progress (IRP) in April last year. Disappointingly during that review, we found that things had got even worse, with some prisoners routinely getting less than an hour out of their cell a day, a shortage of frontline officers and a staff team with low morale. Unusually therefore, I decided that we would conduct an announced inspection, giving the prison six months’ notice to prepare.

A new governor arrived at the jail in August 2023 and I am pleased to report that he had begun to make some good progress with the many challenges that faced this run-down, overcrowded Victorian prison. He had worked on improving the capability and confidence of his staff team, of which a high proportion had fewer than two years’ experience, and we were pleased to see noticeably better staff-prisoner relationships than during our last two visits. The attrition rate of staff was still high but was lower than at our IRP. The governor had introduced a cooked breakfast which was welcomed by prisoners, although they complained that milk was no longer available. Leaders had improved prisoners’ ability to get basic kit such as bedding and clean clothes and a team of skilled prisoners was working around the jail to improve cells and communal areas. It was disappointing that although the prison was cleaner, there remained ingrained dirt in some of the communal areas and rubbish outside had not been cleared away.

The ingress of drugs was a serious problem at Lewes and this was a cause of some of the increases in violence and the use of force. Although there had been a recent reduction in assaults, it was too early to tell if this was the beginning of a trend.

The amount of time that prisoners spent unlocked was better than at the last inspection but was still not as good as we have seen elsewhere. A concerted effort by leaders to improve the reliability of the regime meant that there were no longer the frequent, unplanned cancellations of education or the closure of the library we found on our last visit. There continued to be insufficient activity places for the population and the quality of some of the teaching was not good enough. Assessments had identified the poor literacy and maths levels of many prisoners, but although there was a reading strategy which was much better developed than in other prisons, there were not enough classes to meet this need. Attendance at education was poor, in part due to the scheduling of gym sessions during lesson time.

Our score for our test of preparation for release fell from reasonably good to not sufficiently good, partly because of the pressure that a high-churning remand population was putting on the prison. There was not yet enough provision for remanded prisoners who did not always get their entitlement to visits and had only limited support from the offender management unit in addressing their immediate housing needs. There were some worrying holes in public protection arrangements with only four prisoners subject to phone or mail monitoring, a scarcely credible number in a prison of this type.

We report some serious concerns with the introduction of the end of custody supervised licence scheme that allowed for some prisoners to be released 18 days early. I hope that these are teething troubles and that as the scheme becomes embedded some of these problems will reduce. At Lewes we found too many prisoners released homeless, including on the scheme, and there was some chaotic planning for prisoners who were being released at short notice.

The levels of self-harm at the jail continued to be too high, some of which was no doubt caused by the day-to-day frustrations of prisoners, such as long periods of lock up (particularly at weekends), the poor response to applications, difficulties with booking visits and the amount of time they were spending stuck on remand. Although managers were sighted on some of the causes, not enough progress had yet been made.

This was a more encouraging inspection than at our last two visits to the jail, with an enthusiastic and ambitious governor, an invigorated leadership team, an improvement in staff morale and good support from the prison group director. There is a long way to go at Lewes, which remains a fragile jail with crumbling infrastructure in need of substantial investment, but if the leadership team remains in post I would expect to see further improvements and greater stability at this jail.

Charlie Taylor

HM Chief Inspector of Prisons

March 2024

To read the full report click the tab below…

Full HMIP Latest Inspection Report

The Full Inspection Report is only available to our Enhanced and Corporate Members.

You can quickly upgrade your membership to Enhanced or Corporate by clicking the links above or you can compare all our memberships by clicking Upgrade Now below:

Upgrade Now

Independent Review of Progress Report

Date of last inspection: 2–4 December 2019

Date of publication: 16 January 2020

Key findings:

  • At this IRP visit, we followed up 12 of the 53 recommendations made at our most recent inspection and made judgements about the degree of progress achieved to date. Ofsted followed up three themes.
  • We judged that there was good progress in three recommendations, reasonable progress in six recommendations, and insufficient progress in three recommendations. There was no meaningful progress in any of the recommendations. A summary of the judgements is as follows.
    Lewes IRP 2019 Summary Figure 1
    4 This pie chart excludes any recommendations that were followed up as part of a theme within Ofsted’s concurrent prison monitoring visit.

Figure 2: Judgements against HMI Prisons recommendations from 2019 inspection

Recommendation Judgement
The prison should develop a comprehensive violence reduction action plan, which is driven forward by a sufficiently resourced safer custody team and regularly monitored to establish its effectiveness. (S39) Reasonable progress
The prison should implement a strategy to reduce self-harm, which is based on a robust analysis of self-harm data and delivers consistently good care for prisoners at risk of self-harm through multidisciplinary assessment, care in custody and teamwork (ACCT) case management. (S40) Reasonable progress
Health governance structures should be robust enough to identify and effectively address key risks and concerns and should ensure that prisoners have prompt access to all health services. (S41) Reasonable progress
There should be a prison-wide approach to offender management, based on a robust needs analysis. It should include effective joint working and information exchange, a common approach to record-keeping, and a detailed strategy for managing the large number of sex offenders. (S43) Reasonable progress
Rigorous governance of use of force should ensure that documentation is completed promptly and thoroughly, and that all planned incidents are recorded. (1.27) Good progress
Measures to identify and control drug supply, including suspicion testing and use of technology, should be implemented systematically. (1.43) Reasonable progress
Managers should ensure that staff actively support prisoners and challenge poor behaviour. (2.3) Insufficient progress
Cells, wings and outside areas should be kept clean. (2.10) Reasonable progress
All health care staff should receive regular clinical and managerial supervision and be up to date with mandatory training. (2.52) Good progress
Prisoners with long-term health conditions should receive regular reviews by trained staff, informed by an evidence-based care plan. (2.70) Insufficient progress
Prisoners referred to the service should be reviewed and assessed promptly and offered a suitable range of mental health interventions within agreed timescales. (2.86) Good progress
All eligible prisoners should have an up-to-date OASys assessment. Offender management should proactively engage prisoners and focus on progression and the reduction of risk of harm. (4.15) Insufficient progress
  • Ofsted judged that there was reasonable progress in one theme and insufficient progress in two themes. The was significant progress in none of the themes.
    Lewes IRP 2019 Summary Figure 2

 

Figure 4: Judgements against Ofsted themes5 from 2019 inspection

Ofsted theme Judgement
What progress have leaders and managers made with their strategies to improve the provision of education, skills and work, ensuring that all prisoners are adequately allocated to activities, enabling them to participate in training and qualifications that increase their chances of employability on release? Insufficient
What progress have leaders and managers made in improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment for all groups of learners, ensuring that teachers plan learning to enable prisoners to make good progress, using good learning resources and developing prisoners’ English and mathematics skills? Reasonable
What progress have leaders and managers made in securing good quality work provision that enables prisoners to develop a work ethic and in ensuring that a high number of prisoners complete their qualifications and achieve well? Insufficient

5 Ofsted’s themes incorporate the key concerns at the previous inspection in respect of education, skills and work.

Section 1. Chief Inspector's Summary

1.1 At our inspection of HMP Lewes in 2019 we made the following judgements about outcomes for prisoners.

Lewes IRP 2019 Summary Figure 3

1.2 HMP Lewes in East Sussex is a medium-sized category B local prison. Its main function is to serve the local courts by holding unsentenced and newly sentenced prisoners. The average length of stay is short at about nine weeks. In addition to this core function, the prison holds recalled prisoners and those with a variety of sentence lengths, including lifers and those convicted of sexual offences. Like many other local prisons, it dates from the Victorian era and much of its infrastructure is old and cramped.

1.3 When we inspected the prison in January 2019, it had been in ‘special measures’ for two years, but outcomes for prisoners were declining rather than improving. A great deal of urgent work was needed to improve safety. The number of assaults against staff was high, a fifth of all assaults were serious and a quarter of prisoners said they felt unsafe. Despite this, the prison lacked an effective strategy for reducing violence. Force was used frequently, but its oversight was poor, and far too much paperwork justifying its use was missing. Illicit drugs were a big security problem, yet the prison had not done enough to identify or control their supply. Self-harm was common and five prisoners had taken their own lives between our 2016 and 2019 inspections. Again, the prison lacked an adequate strategic response to this problem. Many prisoners reported that staff treated them with respect, but a number of officers lacked authority and were too passive in their interactions with prisoners. Cleanliness on wings was generally poor and there were rats and large amounts of bird droppings in outside areas. We found very real weaknesses in the leadership and management of health services. These deficiencies meant our colleagues in the Care Quality Commission issued requirement notices relating to three breaches of the commission’s regulations. Mental health services, nurse-led primary care and care for prisoners with long- term conditions were poor. Ofsted judged the overall effectiveness of education, skills and work provision as inadequate, its lowest score. Teaching and prisoners’ learning were not good enough. Too many prisoners were unemployed, with only enough activity places for two-thirds of the population. Prison managers were aware of these problems but did not have a clear strategy for improving learning and skills. Not enough was done to reduce the risks of prisoners reoffending after release. More than 100 assessments of prisoners’ risks were out of date or had not been completed. Prison departments did not work closely to reduce prisoners’ risks and had not adequately analysed the population’s needs. As in many other areas of the prison, there was no overarching strategy for driving improvement in this area.

1.4 During this independent review of progress, we found a prison with a renewed sense of purpose and direction. The prison had been taken out of special measures and had discarded the associated bureaucracy and ineffective action plan. The governor and her senior managers understood our concerns and recommendations, and had formulated a more realistic and focused plan for improvement. We were pleased to find that the prison had made good or reasonably good progress in two-thirds of the areas that we reviewed during this visit.

1.5 The prison had consulted staff and prisoners about what was causing violence in the prison. This consultation had informed a revised safety strategy and action plan. The safer custody team was now better resourced. However, these positive developments had yet to translate into reduced levels of violence. There were in fact now more assaults against staff than at the time of the inspection.

1.6 Managers now had much better oversight of the use of force than at the inspection. Nearly all planned incidents were video-recorded and the amount of outstanding paperwork justifying the use of force had been greatly reduced.

1.7 The number of prisoners testing positive in random drug tests had fallen. Prison staff were making much better use of technology and search dogs to disrupt the supply of drugs. However, staff were still not carrying out enough targeted drug tests following the receipt of intelligence.

1.8 The number of self-harm incidents in the previous six months had declined by over a third compared to a similar period before the inspection. One prisoner had taken their own life following our inspection. Managers had used an analysis of self-harm data to inform a new comprehensive strategy but had yet to publish it. Despite regular quality assurance, assessment, care in custody and team work documentation for those at risk of suicide or self-harm required improvement.

1.9 Managers assertively challenged prisoners’ antisocial behaviour, but officers’ approaches were not always consistent. Despite this, officers were generally supportive of prisoners in their care.

1.10 Managers now paid more attention to cleanliness and hygiene, and overall standards had improved. The problem with rats had been tackled. Offensive displays were no longer visible and graffiti had been reduced. Despite these improvements, some showers were run down and dirty, while many communal areas remained untidy.

1.11 Health governance structures had improved, and health care staff now received clinical and managerial supervision. Care for prisoners with long-term health conditions had also improved but was undermined by the large number of prisoners who did not attend their appointments. The mental health service was better than at the inspection, and more interventions were available.

1.12 There were still insufficient activity places for the population and some prisoners remained unemployed for more than two months. Officers did not routinely challenge prisoners who chose not to attend an activity. The overall quality of teaching, learning and assessment had improved. Prisoners could now study short modules in English and mathematics, which were better suited to the prison with its high turnover of prisoners. However, not enough prisoners benefited from work-related qualifications.

1.13 The prison had published an offender management strategy and established a committee to improve joint working and information sharing between departments involved in prisoners’ rehabilitation. The prison held fewer registered sex offenders than before and had implemented a sensible strategy for managing the population and ensuring prisoners progressed to a more suitable prison.

1.14 The number of prisoners without an offender assessment system (OASys) report had been reduced, but the prison could not tell us how many OASys assessments needed to be reviewed. While some offender management unit staff had frequent, good quality contact with prisoners on their caseload, others did not. Proactive interactions with prisoners were hampered by staff shortages and a lack of suitable interview rooms.

1.15 Overall, this was a promising review. The governor and her senior managers were taking the prison in the right direction. They were realistic about the scale of the challenges they faced and understood that further progress would require sustained effort and vigour. Their challenge now is to build on the progress they have made since the inspection and to translate this work into positive outcomes for prisoners. Nevertheless, they should be congratulated on what they have achieved so far.

Peter Clarke CVO OBE QPM
December 2019
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons

Full IRP Report

The Full Independent Review of Progress Report is only available to our Enhanced and Corporate Members.

You can quickly upgrade your membership to Enhanced or Corporate by clicking the links above or you can compare all our memberships by clicking Upgrade Now below:

Upgrade Now

Facilities Lists

Introduction

A prison’s Facilities List is an important document.

What personal items a prisoner may be allowed to have with them in their cell in a particular prison, the amount they can have of each item, and the mechanism by which they must obtain those items is governed by the prison’s ‘Facilities List’ – each prison’s Facilities List is unique to each prison.

Whether a prisoner can have a particular item on a prison’s Facilities List depends on their status as a remand or convicted prisoner, their level on the Incentive Earned Privileges Scheme, and Volumetric Control limits. Full details of the Incentive Earned Privileges Scheme and Volumetric Control Limits are in the ‘Reception to Release’ Advice Portal, available to Standard Members and above.

Facilities Lists for all prisons are available only to our Enhanced and Corporate Members.

You can quickly upgrade your membership to Enhanced or Corporate by clicking the links above or you can compare all our memberships by clicking Upgrade Now below:

Upgrade Now

Fatal Incident Reports

Details of people who have died in this prison, with copies of the Investigation Report into their deaths, and the Action Plan designed to prevent further similar deaths – all listed by the name of the deceased that is not available anywhere else.

All Fatal Incident Reports

The Fatal Incident Report is only available to our Enhanced and Corporate Members.

You can quickly upgrade your membership to Enhanced or Corporate by clicking the links above or you can compare all our memberships by clicking Upgrade Now below:

Upgrade Now

Location:
England
Gender:
Male
Age Group:
21+
Security Category:
Category B Category C Category D
Operator:
HMPPS
Function:
Reception
HMPPS Region:
Kent, Surrey & Sussex
Physical Health Provider:
Practice Plus Group
Mental Health Provider:
Practice Plus Group
Substance Use Provider:
Practice Plus Group
Learning and Skills Provider:
Weston College
Escort Contractor:
GEOAmey
Designation:
Dual Designated Prison
Facilities Provider:
Gov Facility Services Limited
Off-site Telephone Provider:
Shared Services Connected Ltd (SSCL)
NPS Region:
Region K Kent Surrey and Sussex
Expected Resettlement Region:
Region K Kent Surrey and Sussex
Cohort:
Reception & Resettlement
Alphabetical Group:
K-O
error: No Sorry! This content is protected!